Material laws can take years to develop, but AI could speed up the process
Watson College assistant professor wins NSF grant to explore a better way to create simple-to-use formulas
For hundreds of years, scientists and engineers have relied on analytical formulas to codify important material laws. For instance, Hooke鈥檚 law defines a material鈥檚 elastic properties, and Ohm鈥檚 law calculates the relationship between voltage, current and resistance in an electrical circuit.
Material laws today, however, are far more complicated. Here鈥檚 one example from 91社区 Assistant Professor Pu Zhang鈥檚 research: The electrical conductivity of a soft conductive material, an important component in soft electronics, is generally mapped out as a tensor function form in 12-dimension space.
Recognizing those patterns and breaking them down into simple-to-use mathematical formulas can take years 鈥 often decades 鈥 of experimentation and derivation, even for the most skilled scientists and engineers.
Zhang, a faculty member at the Thomas J. Watson College of Engineering and Applied Science鈥檚 Department of Mechanical Engineering, wants to speed up the material law discovery process with artificial intelligence, and will fund his research.
Thanks to the launch of ChatGPT last fall, both the promises and pitfalls of AI systems moved into the cultural mainstream. AI is nothing new, though: Researchers have been refining and improving the technology since the 1950s.
Over the past few years, Zhang has studied the conductive properties of liquid metal materials. In 2022, he received an NSF CAREER Award to explore his ideas about liquid metal networks in soft electronics that can bend or stretch without breaking.
He will collaborate with Assistant Professor Lin Cheng at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts to develop a new AI technique to generate analytical material laws.
鈥淚f we have raw data about how a material鈥檚 physical properties change during deformation, we aim to find the specific mathematical formulas of material laws,鈥 Zhang said. 鈥淚t used to take years to develop one new law. Now with these AI algorithms, maybe in a day you can discover a lot. This will revolutionize the whole field.鈥
To figure out a new path, Zhang and Cheng will look to symbolic AI, which interprets and generates equations instead of words as ChatGPT does.
鈥淧eople have developed plugins you can add to ChatGPT to interpret simple mathematical equations, mostly on a K to 12 level,鈥 Zhang said. 鈥淔or university research, what we need is very advanced math on a graduate-school level, and this is still something ChatGPT 鈥 even the add-ons 鈥 cannot do.鈥
The researchers also hope to shed more light on the opaque way that AI often works, which makes results difficult to adjust and interpret.
鈥淎 mainstream approach in the past few years has been AI and data-based modeling,鈥 Zhang said. 鈥淭hey train a huge neural network that鈥檚 like a black box 鈥 you input data, you get output data, that鈥檚 it. Nobody knows what鈥檚 really going on in the black box. It鈥檚 very hard to use because you download a code and not a mathematical formula you can use directly.鈥
Another recurring problem with AI algorithms: They sometimes offer plausible responses that are completely wrong 鈥 a phenomenon that computer programmers call 鈥渉allucinations.鈥 For instance, it might incorrectly summarize a book that an author never wrote or cite legal precedents that never actually happened.
While clearly any formulas will need to be checked through experimentation, Zhang hopes that 鈥渉allucinations鈥 and other troubling output can be avoided.
鈥淥ne advantage of our symbolic AI technique is that we have a firm mathematical foundation, which will add all the physical constraints with material laws automatically,鈥 he said. 鈥淎t least it won鈥檛 be too wrong, and it will help the algorithm to find the right functions.鈥
Zhang and Cheng submitted their proposal to the NSF before the nonprofit OpenAI launched ChatGPT, but now it鈥檚 a hot topic for researchers, students and the tech industry. Although they are developing their software to solve materials science problems, the principles could be applied to many different endeavors that seek analytical formulas from raw data.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a big time for AI, not only for computer science but for all other scientific fields,鈥 Zhang said. 鈥淏efore ChatGPT, the research community was still conservative about AI 鈥 many people were still against it. People would say it鈥檚 a black box or it鈥檚 curve-fitting to predict a desired outcome. After ChatGPT, many people changed their minds. They started to recognize the potential of AI and embrace it.鈥
At the end of the three-year project, the researchers plan to host a website where users can upload data and let the algorithm develop relevant equations for teaching and research purposes. From there, they could expand through further funding to boost hardware and software capabilities or license the technology to a software company.
Zhang admits he鈥檚 not sure how AI will change his research, academia or society in general, but he expects many things will shift in a short time.
鈥淭his area is developing very, very quickly,鈥 he said. 鈥淲ithin five to 10 years, we will see a revolution. I鈥檝e never seen such a situation before. In the past 20 years, we have seen so many leaps in nanotechnology, energy and 3D printing, but this wave of AI feels different.鈥